Ralph Castain <rhc_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> Dropped CR is definitely reason not to use OMPI past 1.6. [By the way,
>> the release notes are confusing, saying that DMTCP is supported, but CR
>> is dropped.] I'd have hoped a vendor who needs to support CR would
>> contribute, but I suppose changes just become proprietary if they move
>> the base past 1.6 :-(.
> Not necessarily
It looks so from here, but I'd be glad if not.
>> For general information, what makes the CR support difficult to maintain
>> -- is it just a question of effort?
> Largely a lack of interest. Very few (i.e., a handful) of people
> around the world use it,
That's surprising; I've certainly felt the lack of it from using PSM.
> and it is hard to justify putting in the
> effort for that small a user group.
Perhaps it's chicken and egg with use and support.