Open MPI logo

Open MPI User's Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |   all Open MPI User's mailing list

Subject: Re: [OMPI users] users Digest, Vol 1750, Issue 1
From: George Markomanolis (george_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-11-25 12:29:02

> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 10:27:37 -0800
> From: Eugene Loh <eugene.loh_at_[hidden]>
> Subject: Re: [OMPI users] tool for measuring the ping with accuracy
> To: Open MPI Users <users_at_[hidden]>
> Message-ID: <4CEC0799.60508_at_[hidden]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> George Markomanolis wrote:
>> Dear Eugene,
>> Thanks a lot for the answer you were right for the eager mode.
>> I have one more question. I am looking for an official tool to measure
>> the ping time, just sending a message of 1 byte or more and measure
>> the duration of the MPI_Send command on the rank 0 and the duration of
>> the MPI_Recv on rank 1. I would like to know any formal tool because I
>> am using also SkaMPI and the results really depend on the call of the
>> synchronization before the measurement starts.
>> So for example with synchronizing the processors, sending 1 byte, I have:
>> rank 0, MPI_Send: ~7 ms
>> rank 1, MPI_Recv: ~52 ms
>> where 52 ms is almost the half of the ping-pong and this is ok.
>> Without synchronizing I have:
>> rank 0, MPI_Send: ~7 ms
>> rank 1, MPI_Recv: ~7 ms
>> However I developed a simple application where the rank 0 sends 1000
>> messages of 1 byte to rank 1 and I have almost the second timings with
>> the 7 ms. If in the same application I add the MPI_Recv and MPI_Send
>> respectively in order to have a ping-pong application then the
>> ping-pong duration is 100ms (like SkaMPI). Can someone explain me why
>> is this happening? The ping-pong takes 100 ms and the ping without
>> synchronization takes 7 ms.
> I'm not convinced I'm following you at all. Maybe the following helps,
> though maybe it's just obvious and misses the point you're trying to make.
> In a ping-pong test, you have something like this:
> tsend = MPI_Wtime()
> MPI_Send
> tsend = MPI_Wtime() - tsend
> trecv = MPI_Wtime()
> MPI_Recv
> trecv = MPI_Wtime() - trecv
> The send time times how long it takes to get the message out of the
> user's send buffer. This time is very short. In contrast, the
> "receive" time mostly measures how long it takes for the ping message to
> reach the peer and the pong message to return. The actual time to do
> the receive processing is very short and accounts for a tiny fraction of
> trecv.
> If a sender sends many short messages to a receiver and the two
> processes don't synchronize much, you can overlap many messages and hide
> the long transit time.
> Here's a simple model:
> sender injects message into interconnect, MPI_Send completes (this time
> is short)
> message travels the interconnect to the receiver (this time is long)
> receiver unpacks the message and MPI_Recv completes (this time is short)
> A ping-pong test counts the long inter-process transit time. Sending
> many short messages before synchronizing hides the long transit time.
> Sorry if this discussion misses the point you're trying to make.
Dear Eugene,

Thanks a lot, this was what I wanted to know. Now I understood it.

Best regards,
George Markomanolis