Open MPI logo

Open MPI User's Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |   all Open MPI User's mailing list

Subject: Re: [OMPI users] strange undefined references to mpi_sizeofXXX_ errors with pgi
From: Aaron Knister (aaron.knister_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-12-27 14:32:40

I forgot to mention that the undefined references in the shared library only occur of the f90 module was compiled with the "-g" option to pgf90.

On Dec 27, 2009, at 2:28 PM, Aaron Knister wrote:

> I don't think this is actually OpenMPI's problem. I know this is getting slightly off topic but before I take this to the PGI folks I'd like to make sure it isn't actually an OpenMPI problem after all. Here's my best shot at explaining what I think is going on. Please excuse my rusty terminology.
> If one uses the PGI compilers to build a shared library based on an f90 module the resulting object file and shared library contain references to any subroutines defined inside any interfaces defined in said module. This can be verified with nm. If you then link against the produced shared library the compilation will fail with "undefined references" to any of the subroutines that were contained inside any defined interfaces (that aren't defined within the code being compiled). This doesn't seem to happen with the GNU or Intel compilers. I have a small test case that I think reproduces the problem here. Since I'm not by any means a fortran expert I was wondering if somebody on the list who is a little more versed in fortran could verify that this code is correct and should compile (it does with gnu and intel compilers). The makefile can be found here and the source files are below.
> mymod.f90:
> module mymod
> interface my_interface
> subroutine my_subroutine
> integer i
> end subroutine my_subroutine
> end interface
> end module
> main.f90:
> program main
> print *, "hello world"
> end program
> On Dec 24, 2009, at 6:15 PM, Aaron Knister wrote:
>> I'm running into a strange problem with openmpi and the pgi compiler (version 9.0-4). I first stumbled across this when using petsc but have reduced it to a few lines of test code to demonstrate the problem I'm seeing. Essentially it appears as if a shared library contains a fortran-compiled object file that a) was built with "-g" and b) contains "use mpi" will produce errors similar to these when it is linked against:
>> ./ undefined reference to `mpi_sizeof3dch_'
>> ./ undefined reference to `mpi_sizeof4dl_'
>> ./ undefined reference to `mpi_sizeof2dl_'
>> ./ undefined reference to `mpi_sizeof2dch_'
>> ./ undefined reference to `mpi_sizeof0dl_'
>> ./ undefined reference to `mpi_sizeof1dch_'
>> ./ undefined reference to `mpi_sizeof3dl_'
>> ./ undefined reference to `mpi_sizeof1dl_'
>> ./ undefined reference to `mpi_sizeof0dch_'
>> ./ undefined reference to `mpi_sizeof4dch_'
>> Take the following code-
>> libfoo.f90:
>> subroutine printhi()
>> use mpi
>> ! do some mpi stuff
>> print *, "Hello"
>> end
>> main.f90:
>> program myprog
>> call printhi()
>> end
>> And to compile (using openmpi built with pgi):
>> mpif90 -g -c -fPIC libfoo.f90
>> cc -shared -Wl -o libfoo.o
>> mpif90 -g main.f90 -lfoo -L. -o main
>> If I remove the "-g" from the first mpif90 command, then the compile finishes and there are no errors about undefined references.
>> This occurs with openmpi-1.4 but ONLY with the pgi fortran compilers. I can't reproduce this behavior with either gnu gfortran or intel's ifort.
>> I'm not sure if this is a pgi problem or an openmpi problem or if I'm missing something.
>> Any help would be much appreciated!
>> -Aaron