Jeff Squyres wrote:
> Hah; this is probably at least tangentially related to
This looks related, perhaps something about suggesting using the -gnu4 option
might be nice to add, if not there then maybe someplace else?
> I'll be kind and say that Pathscale has been "unwilling to help on these
> kinds of issues" with me in the past as well. :-)
They've been very responsive for me and their suggestions do generally do the
trick. There is no doubt the compiler is smoking fast, its just about
> It's not entirely clear from the text, but I guess that sounds like
> Pathscale is unsupported on GCC 3.x systems...? Is that what you parse
> his answer to mean?
From Pathscale: "PathScale does not support C++ OpenMP support on RHEL4. As I
noted earlier, RHEL4 is otherwise supported for all other compiler features, and
it's tested as well."