On Nov 3, 2006, at 12:11 PM, Tim Mattox wrote:
> That would be a good flag to have.
K. I'll file a feature enhancement. This is probably an MTT 2.0
thing, because it's a whole lot easier with the new schema.
> Also, is there someway we can after-the-fact, mark a set of results
> as invalid?
> Say, when we have a hardware fault on a cluster that causes some tests
> to fail...
Right now, all you can do is e-mail Ethan / mtt-users. :-)
Server Virtualization Business Unit