Thanks a lot ! This is exactly the kind of clarification I've been looking
for and it's great to know it's been added to the official docs. hwloc is a
pleasure to work with.
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Samuel Thibault
> Vlad, le Thu 31 May 2012 16:49:00 +0200, a écrit :
> > This might be a naive question, but I'd like to clarify nonetheless: to
> > any sort of affinity guarantees, hwloc mem binding APIs assume that any
> > allocation is done exclusively via hwloc_alloc_membind() and friends?
> And if I
> > use "raw" calls to malloc() or posix_memalign() etc then any ensuing
> > will be incidental at best?
> It seems the documentation lacks explanation about that indeed. I have
> added the following text:
> Memory binding can be done three ways:
> - explicit memory allocation thanks to hwloc_alloc_membind and friends:
> binding will have effect on the memory allocated by these functions.
> - implicit memory binding through binding policy: hwloc_set_membind and
> friends only define the current policy of the process, which will be
> applied to the subsequent calls to malloc() and friends.
> - migration of existing memory ranges, thanks to hwloc_set_area_membind()
> and friends, which move already-allocated data.
> Does it answer your question? (i.e. the first way doesn't have effect on
> malloc, while the second way does)
> hwloc-users mailing list