I couldn't compile trunk (rather, autogen.sh failed because it requires Autoconf > 2.63), so I just pulled the nightly build hwloc-1.0a1r1682 and applied the patch there. Does that sound reasonable?
I've attached the new (much more verbose) result of lstopo.
From: hwloc-users-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:hwloc-users-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Samuel Thibault
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:09 AM
To: Hardware locality user list
Subject: Re: [hwloc-users] No caches or hiearchy on RHEL 4.7 or 4.8
Dan Eaton, le Thu 28 Jan 2010 11:03:07 -0700, a écrit :
> If I go through the API (which I would do anyway, I just wanted a
> "taste" with lstopo), can I choose to override information reported by
> the OS (i.e. go straight to CPUID), or do I still require the patch in
> this case?
The x86 backend is very recent, I haven't implemented any interface to
override the information with the CPUID information yet, but I guess
we'll plan to do it.
> Unfortunately that version of x86info requires glibc 2.4 -- RHEL 4.x only has 2.3.4.
Ok, then please run with my patch and passing --enable-debug to
./configure, lstopo will give the APIC IDs.
hwloc-users mailing list