Open MPI logo

Hardware Locality Development Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |   all Hardware Locality Development mailing list

Subject: Re: [hwloc-devel] Move to git?
From: Brice Goglin (Brice.Goglin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-06-04 06:23:22

When I switched Open-MX and KNEM from SVN to GIT, I basically just
pushed my git-svn clone. But I had to manually convert some svn
tags/branches. IIRC, the main reason is that git-svn has a strange way
to name svn branches in git.

We may also have to pass --authors-file to git svn clone so that SVN
logins are converted into proper git author names.


Le 04/06/2013 12:14, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) a écrit :
> Ok. This is kinda what I assumed your response would be. :-)
> Let me talk to Dave Goodell later today, who just recently went through converting MPICH from SVN -> Git, and see what kinds of things we need to do to get the ball rolling here, and what kinds of dragons we should expect to encounter along the way.
> On Jun 3, 2013, at 11:17 PM, Brice Goglin <brice.goglin_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> +1000 !!!!!
>> I already use git-svn for most of my hwloc work. But I still need svn for backports, and that wastes a lot of my time.
>> Brice
>> "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" <jsquyres_at_[hidden]> a écrit :
>> We're having a discussion (again :-) ) about moving OMPI to a DVCS.
>> The short conclusion of the long conversation is: the OMPI dev community would be much more comfortable moving to a DVCS if they could see some success with other OMPI projects (e.g., hwloc and/or MTT).
>> Would hwloc be interested in moving to git? This would mean:
>> 1. converting the existing svn to git
>> --> including all historical log messages that refer to "rXXXX"
>> 2. converting the existing trac to git
>> --> including all trac tickets, comments, and wiki pages that refer to "rXXXX"
>> The OMPI devs -- who are mostly unfamiliar with git -- would like to see some close-to-home successes with git over a period of time that don't require heavy administrative maintenance over time (one of the pushback issues was that some organizations have hired full-time people to
>> maintain/fix git repositories when they break/become unusable).
>> Interested?