On Sep 24, 2011, at 10:01 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:
> On Sep 24, 2011, at 5:52 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
>> On Sep 24, 2011, at 7:46 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
>>>> The funky thing here is that the parent/child links between the first
>>>> socket and its core go across level 2 because nothing matches there. In
>>>> the first socket, you have Socket(depth1)->Core(depth3) while in the
>>>> second socket you have Socket(depth1)->Cache(depth2)->Core(depth3)
>> Oh crap; this scenario is explicitly listed in the figure on page 21 of the letter PDF. :-\
>> So... disregard my comments here.
> You might want to point that section out in hwloc.h as this is somewhat non-intuitive.
>> Jeff Squyres
>> For corporate legal information go to:
>> hwloc-devel mailing list
> hwloc-devel mailing list
For corporate legal information go to: