On Feb 22, 2011, at 12:18 AM, Brice Goglin wrote:
>> Should we release 1.1.2 with the HEAD of v1.1 (there's a few pending bug fixes there) and call the 1.1.x series "done"?
> We need a 1.1.2 in the near future (including what Guy Streeter reported
> yesterday, but I won't work on it before I come back online by the end
> of the week).
> My feeling is that hwloc 1.2 is not very far away, but still too far
> away from OMPI 1.5.2. If you can backport the de-c99 directly into
> OMPI's copy of hwloc for now, I'd vote for not backporting it at all in
> the upstream hwloc 1.1.
Ok. It's took late for OMPI 1.5.2; by the time 1.5.3 is ready, we might be ready with hwloc 1.2, which would be a heckuva lot simpler for me. :-)
For corporate legal information go to: