Open MPI logo

Hardware Locality Development Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |   all Hardware Locality Development mailing list

Subject: Re: [hwloc-devel] [hwloc-announce] Hardware locality (hwloc) v1.1rc1 released
From: Brice Goglin (Brice.Goglin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-11-11 07:17:42

Le 11/11/2010 13:08, Jirka Hladky a écrit :
> On Thursday, November 11, 2010 11:11:31 am Brice Goglin wrote:
>> Le 11/11/2010 02:31, Samuel Thibault a écrit :
>>>> get_mempolicy: Invalid argument
>>>> hwloc_get_membind failed (errno 22 Invalid argument)
>>> Could you try to increase the value of max_os_index?
>>> I can see in the kernel source code the following in sys_get_mempolicy:
>>> if (nmask != NULL && maxnode < MAX_NUMNODES)
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>> and MAX_NUMNODES depends on .config ...
>> And indeed MAX_NUMNODES is (1<<CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT) and
>> CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT=9 on rhel6 kernels. We pass a single ulong to the
>> kernel, so it's not large enough to store 1<<9 bits. We couldn't
>> reproduce on Debian and RHEL5 since NODE_SHIFT=6 there.
>> We had to loop until we found the kernel NR_CPUS for sched_getaffinity,
>> we can do the same to find the kernel MAX_NUMNODES for get_mempolicy.
>> The attached patch may help. Only slightly tested obviously since I
>> don't have any kernel causing the problem.
>> Brice
> Hi Brice,
> thanks for the quick patch. I have tested it and it works! :-)
> $ utils/hwloc-bind --membind node:1 --mempolicy interleave -- utils/hwloc-bind
> --get --membind
> 0x0000aaaa (interleave)
> I have couple of questions:
> 1) Does the option --get works together with --pid ? Like finding out mempolicy
> for any pid? I don't think that get_mempolicy supports this.

Right, it's not supported on Linux.

> We can perhaps
> enhance the parsing to raise an error when --pid and --get are both specified.

It actually depends on the OS. I'll see what I can.

> 2) This might be a dumb question - I have tried --get on my laptop which is
> running Fedora-12. It's one socket system with NUMA enabled - there is however
> only node#0. I know that it's nonsense. But still, you can use this to run
> some tests
> I'm quite puzzled by the following output:
> $utils/hwloc-bind --membind node:0 --mempolicy interleave -- utils/hwloc-bind
> --get --membind
> 0xf...f (interleave)
> What does "0xf...f" mean?

0xf...f is a full set (all bit from 0 to infinity are set). It means
that the memory binding is set to "near all the memory of the machine".
Finding a behavior that works for both NUMA and non-NUMA cases was not

> 3) Just a small hint. Fedora 12 is using almost the same kernel as RHEL-6.

Ah good to know, thanks. I am deploying a F12 machine right now to check