Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On Oct 28, 2009, at 9:29 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>> > I would think that the API *only* looks at the names passed as
>> > parameters -- command line, env variable, etc. are upper-layer
>> > abstractions added by top-level tools like lstopo, etc.
>> See Brice's case, where it's not the user that provides the xml file,
>> but a deployment tool.
> Ya, I saw that. For a small tool like the hwloc library, it doesn't
> feel right to offer back-door hooks that can circumvent the
> application. If an application is buggy, then the application should
> be fixed -- it doesn't seem like the right thing to intentionally add
> hooks just to accommodate buggy applications. Is that what you're
> suggesting, or am I missing the point?
It's not (only) about buggy applications, the bug could in hwloc as
well. You might want to check the hwloc behavior with this application
if the topology if different.