Just made a fix – there was a semi-colon instead of a comma.  I can’t build this, so
 it you want to give it a shot, I would appreciate this.


On 9/26/07 1:12 PM, "Don Kerr" <Don.Kerr@sun.com> wrote:


It appears the the udapl btl is not even building in your tmp branch.


  "btl_udapl.c", line 305: syntax error before or at: ;
  "btl_udapl.c", line 315: syntax error before or at: )
  "btl_udapl.c", line 374: cannot recover from previous errors
  cc: acomp failed for btl_udapl.c
  make[2]: *** [btl_udapl.lo] Error 1
  make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
  make[2]: Leaving directory
  make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
  make[1]: Leaving directory
  make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1

Richard Graham wrote:

>We are looking at making some changes to the ompi free list in ompi/class/
>ompi_free_list.[c,h] , and are trying to decide if to go ahead with an
>interface change that will allow separate control over alignment of the frag
>and payload data structures.  We are aware of several implementations of
>btl's and mtl's that are not part of the Open MPI repository, and want to
>minimize changes to these.  We have an option to make these changes by
>duplicating code, and creating a new set of functions to handle the
>alignment (and other cleanup) issues, not perturbing existing code.  The
>questions are, does anyone have code out there that uses the ompi free
>lists, and if so would would an interface change to the init functions cause
>you trouble ?
>devel mailing list
devel mailing list