#4815 is indirectly related to the move :
in bcol/basesmuma, we used to compare ompi_process_name_t, and now we
compare an ompi_process_name_t and an opal_process_name_t (which causes
a glory SIGSEGV)
i proposed a temporary patch which is both broken and unelegant,
could you please advise a correct solution ?
On 2014/07/27 7:37, George Bosilca wrote:
> If you have any issue with the move, Ill be happy to help and/or support you on your last move toward a completely generic BTL. To facilitate your work I exposed a minimalistic set of OMPI information at the OPAL level. Take a look at opal/util/proc.h for more info, but please try not to expose more.