Yes, they should be oshcc, oshCC (there are no C++ bindings, but there is a wrapper compiler), and oshfort, according to the specification.
Brian W. Barrett
Scalable System Software Group
Sandia National Laboratories
From: devel [devel-bounces_at_[hidden]] on behalf of Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) [jsquyres_at_[hidden]]
Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2013 4:13 AM
To: Open MPI Developers
Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] [EXTERNAL] oshmem implementation still lacking
On Sep 15, 2013, at 12:10 PM, "Barrett, Brian W" <bwbarre_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Are the wrapper compilers named shmem<lang>? Given that the OpenSHMEM specification specifically calls out the name of the wrapper compilers as osh<lang>, we should probably follow that convention.
Yes, they're named shmemcc and shmemfort.
So they should be named oshcc and oshfort? I.e., is there a convention for <lang>?
For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
devel mailing list