Open MPI logo

Open MPI Development Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |   all Development mailing list

Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: hwloc object userdata
From: Jeff Squyres (jsquyres_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-10-03 10:29:53

On Oct 3, 2012, at 10:22 AM, George Bosilca wrote:

> In the case such a functionality become necessary, I would suggest we use a mechanism similar to the attributes in MPI (but without the multi-language mess). That will allow whoever want to attach data to a hwloc node, to do it without the mess of dealing with reserving a slot. It might require a little bit more memory, but so far the number of nodes in the HWLOC data is limited.

You mean something like putting this in opal/mca/hwloc/base/base.h:

typedef enum {
  /* ... */
} opal_hwloc_base_userdata_consumers_t;

And then:

0. if any new upper-level consumer wants to hang stuff off hwloc userdata, they just add another enum
1. hwloc base hangs a (void *opal[OPAL_HWLOC_BASE_MAX]) off each hwloc obj
2. each upper level consumer uses their enum to set/get their stuff

Is that what you're thinking?

> george.
> On Oct 3, 2012, at 16:13 , Jeff Squyres <jsquyres_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> WHAT: allowing multiple entities in the OMPI code base to hang data off hwloc_obj->userdata
>> WHY: anticipating that more parts of the OMPI code base will be using the hwloc data
>> WHERE: hwloc base
>> WHEN: no real hurry; Ralph and I just identified the potential for this issue this morning. We're not aware of it being an actual problem (yet).
>> The rmaps base (in mpirun) is currently hanging its own data off various objects in the hwloc topology tree. However, it should be noted that the hwloc topology tree is a global data structure in each MPI processes; multiple upper-level entities in the ORTE and OMPI layers may want to hang their own userdata off hwloc objects.
>> Ralph and I figured that some functionality could be added to the hwloc base to hang a opal_pointer_array off each hwloc object; each array value will be a (void*). Then upper-level entities can reserve a slot in all the pointer arrays and store whatever they want in their (void*) slot.
>> For example, if the openib BTL wants to use the hwloc data and hang its own userdata off hwloc objects, it can call the hwloc base and reserve a slot. The hwloc base will say "Ok, you can have slot 7". Then the openib BTL can always use slot 7 in the opal_pointer_array off any hwloc object.
>> Does this sound reasonable?
>> --
>> Jeff Squyres
>> jsquyres_at_[hidden]
>> For corporate legal information go to:
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> devel_at_[hidden]
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel_at_[hidden]

Jeff Squyres
For corporate legal information go to: