Open MPI logo

Open MPI Development Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |   all Development mailing list

Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] [OMPI svn-full] svn:open-mpi r26106
From: Jeffrey Squyres (jsquyres_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-09 13:35:40

On Mar 9, 2012, at 1:32 PM, Nathan Hjelm wrote:

> An mpool that is aware of local processes lru's will solve the problem in most cases (all that I have seen)

I agree -- don't let words in my emails make you think otherwise. I think this will fix "most" problems, but undoubtedly, some will still occur.

What's your timeline for having this ready -- should it go to 1.5.5, or 1.6?

More specifically: if it's immanent, and can go to v1.5, then the openib message is irrelevant and should not be used (and backed out of the trunk). If it's going to take a little bit, I'm ok leaving the message in v1.5.5 for now.

> but yes, we need to rework the pml to handle the remaining cases. There are two things that need to be changed (from what I can tell):
> 1) allow rget to fallback to send/put depending on the failure (I have fallback on put implemented in my branch-- and in my btl).
> 2) need to devise new criteria on when we should progress the rdma_pending list to avoid deadlock.
> #1 is fairly simple and I haven't given much though to #2.
> -Nathan
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel_at_[hidden]

Jeff Squyres
For corporate legal information go to: