yes, I'll try openmpi-1.3.3 on Monday. However, I had look at the svn
code before, and haven't noticed any substantial changes in the code
under the question.
The reason I'm writing to devel@ (and not just reporting a bug) is
that I'm interested in how it is _supposed_ to work. Are there people
who wrote the code (or understand it) on the list?
On 03/10/2009, Jeff Squyres <jsquyres_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Sep 29, 2009, at 1:36 PM, Roman Cheplyaka wrote:
>> Thanks for your explanation, George. However:
>> suppose we have leave_pinned = FALSE. Then we go to
>> mca_mpool_rdma_find. There we try to find suitable registration in the
>> cache. Suppose we cannot (cache's empty). Then NULL registration is
>> returned, BTL is skipped and 0 is returned from mca_pml_ob1_rdma_btls.
>> This way RDMA never happends.
>> (To make it clear: this is not some theoretical situation, this is
>> what I'm actually observing. OpenMPI 1.2.9) Can somebody explain
> Sorry for the delay in replying.
> We actually haven't looked at the 1.2.x code in quite a while -- is it
> possible for you to upgrade to the 1.3 series? There have been *many*
> improvements in the overall code base since the 1.2 series.
> Jeff Squyres
> devel mailing list
Roman I. Cheplyaka