On May 14, 2009, at 2:22 PM, Brian W. Barrett wrote:
> > We actually took pains to *not* do that; we *used* to do that and
> > took it out. :-\ IIRC, it had something to do with dlopen'ing
> Actually, I think that was something else. Today, libopen-rte.la
> libopen-pal.la as a dependency and libmpi.la lists libopen-rte.la.
> I had
> removed the dependency of libmpi.la on libopen-pal.la because it was
> causing libopen-pal.so to be listed twice by libtool, which was
> It would be a trivial fix to change the Makefiles to make libmpi.la to
> depend on libopen-pal.la as well as libopen-rte.la.
Ah -- am I thinking of us removing libmpi (etc.) from the DSOs?