Open MPI logo

Open MPI Development Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |   all Development mailing list

Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: Eliminate ompi/class/ompi_[circular_buffer_]fifo.h
From: Eugene Loh (Eugene.Loh_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-02-12 17:58:17

Sorry, what's the connection? Are we talking about ? Are you simply saying
that if I'm doing some sm BTL work, I should also look at 1791? I'm
trying to figure out if there's some more specific connection I'm missing.

Ralph Castain wrote:

> You might want to look at ticket #1791 while you are doing this -
> Brad added some valuable data earlier today.
> On Feb 12, 2009, at 12:13 PM, Eugene Loh wrote:
>> Jeff Squyres wrote:
>>> This should probably include the disclaimer that we talked about
>>> this extensively yesterday at the sm/btl meeting after the MPI
>>> Forum meeting in San Jose.
>>> Eugene has been working on new sm stuff (as he has posted), and we
>>> had a very productive meeting yesterday discussing what he has
>>> done and how to get it all into the trunk. Have a look at his
>>> slides at the bottom of this wiki page:
>>> Eugene will be replacing the current sm btl with a new one
>> Let's downgrade that statement. I intend to make a series of
>> putbacks to the current sm BTL to improve latency. I'm not so much
>> "replacing" the current BTL as doing some optimization work.
>>> that uses a single queue and various other improvements. Hence,
>>> the current ompi_*fifo.h files will no longer be necessary.
>>> Additionally, we resolved the "abstraction break" issues that were
>>> discussed here on the list a little while ago -- we think all the
>>> improvements can be done in the current architecture without
>>> disrupting the abstraction barriers. This RFC is one step in the
>>> process; eliminate some no- longer-necessary kruft.
>>> On Feb 12, 2009, at 8:53 AM, Eugene Loh wrote:
>>>> RFC: Eliminate ompi/class/ompi_[circular_buffer_]fifo.h
>>>> WHAT: Eliminate those two include files.
>>>> WHY: These include files are only used by the sm BTL. They
>>>> are not generally usable. Further, the sm BTL will soon no
>>>> longer use them. The current FIFOs support only a single sender
>>>> each and we want multiple senders to be able to share a common
>>>> FIFO. The current FIFOs also can grow without bound, which is
>>>> complicated support that we don't think we need.
>>>> WHERE: Two include files: ompi/class/ompi_[circular_buffer_]fifo.h
>>>> WHEN: "Immediately". Intended for 1.3.x.
>>>> TIMEOUT: February 20, 2009.