Tim Prins wrote:
> A couple of questions.
> First, in opal_condition_wait (condition.h:97) we do not release the
> passed mutex if opal_using_threads() is not set. Is there a reason for
> this? I ask since this violates the way condition variables are supposed
> to work, and it seems like there are situations where this could cause
So in (partial) answer to my own email, this is because throughout the
code we do:
So this relies on opal_condition_wait not touching the lock. This
explains it, but it still seems very wrong.
> Also, when we are using threads, there is a case where we do not
> decrement the signaled count, in condition.h:84. Gleb put this in in
> r9451, however the change does not make sense to me. I think that the
> signal count should always be decremented.
> Can anyone shine any light on these issues?
> devel mailing list