Open MPI logo

Open MPI Development Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |   all Development mailing list

From: Richard Graham (rlgraham_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-11-02 14:06:32

R16641 should have fixed the regression. Anyone using ompi_free_list_t_ex()
and providing
 a memory allocator would have been bitten by this, since I did not update
this function
 (which will be deprecated in favor of a version parallel to
ompi_free_list_t_new) to initialize
 the new fields defined. From looking through the btls, this seems to be
only the openib btl.


On 11/2/07 12:31 PM, "Richard Graham" <rlgraham_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> On 11/2/07 12:21 PM, "Jeff Squyres" <jsquyres_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> The freelist changes from yesterday appear to have broken the openib
>> btl. We didn't get lots of test failures in MTT last night only
>> because there was a separate (unrelated) typo in the ofud BTL that
>> prevented the nightly tarball from building on any IB-capable
>> machines. :-)
>> Rich hopes to look into fixing the openib BTL problem today; he
>> thinks it's a case of a simple oversight: the openib BTL is not using
>> the new freelist init functions.
>> Rich: are there other places that are not using the new init
>> functions that need to?
>>>> >> the ompi free list has two init functions, I changed just one. The IB
>>>> btl uses the
>>>> >> one I have not yet changed, but the pml uses the one I did change.
>>>> >> rich
>> --
>> Jeff Squyres
>> Cisco Systems
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> devel_at_[hidden]
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel_at_[hidden]