Wow - that's an ancient one. I'll see if it can be applied to 1.8.1. These things don't automatically go across - it requires that someone file a request to move it - and I think this commit came into the trunk after we branched for the 1.7 series.


On Apr 9, 2014, at 12:05 PM, Richard Shaw <jrs65@cita.utoronto.ca> wrote:

I'm not sure I ever replied to this to say that the patch works perfectly (very belatedly)!

However I just wanted to ask what the progress of getting this into a released version is? I'm not particularly sure on the details on the OpenMPI development process - I've noticed that it's still in the SVN trunk, but hasn't made it into any of the intervening releases (neither stables 1.6.2-, 1.8; nor feature releases 1.7 onwards). Will this end up in the 1.9 series?

Richard


On 24 July 2012 19:02, Richard Shaw <jrs65@cita.utoronto.ca> wrote:
Thanks George, I'm glad it wasn't just me being crazy. I'll try and test that one soon.

Cheers,
Richard

On Tuesday, 24 July, 2012 at 6:28 PM, George Bosilca wrote:

Richard,

Thanks for identifying this issue and for the short example. I can confirm your original understanding was right, the upper bound should be identical on all ranks. I just pushed a patch (r26862), let me know if this fixes your issue.

  Thanks,
    george.


_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users