Could you please compare the output from “mpif77/mpif90 -showme” when executed from the command line and from inside the Makefile? Could you also check that the argument to MPI_INIT is a normal INTEGER and is not getting some funny KIND or preprocessor treatment?
Hristo Iliev, Ph.D. -- High Performance Computing
RWTH Aachen University, Center for Computing and Communication
From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com] On Behalf Of Mohamad Ali Rostami
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 9:36 AM
To: Jeff Squyres
Cc: Open MPI Users
Subject: Re: [OMPI users] MPI Problem
By adding all the libraries which I found from mpif90/mpif77 --showme,
Fortran 77 version worked finally,
but Fortran 90 version still has the problem.
Error: There is no specific subroutine for the generic 'mpi_init' at (1)
On Jun 25, 2012, at 3:59 PM, Mohamad Ali Rostami wrote:
> > mpif90 my_application.f90 -o my_application
> Yes, as I told you out of make file, it works.
> The problem is something strange in the make file.
I'm sorry; I must have mis-parsed your issue, then. So just to make sure I understand:
shell$ mpif90 my_application.f90 -o my_application
Works fine, but:
...something that eventually invokes "mpif90 my_application.f90 -o my_application"
doesn't work. Right?
If you're invoking the exact same command in both cases (interactive shell and makefile), the *usual* cause of this kind of problem is that the "mpif90" in your Makefile is picking up a different mpif90 than the one that is picked up by your shell. Meaning: your PATH has been reset in the sub-process where "make" is executed, and so when make forks off "mpif90", it finds a different one than the one you execute interactively in the shell.
Check what your path is and/or exactly which mpif90 is getting invoked by your Makefile.
For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/