Here's a better patch. Still only compile tested :)
Brice


Le 11/04/2012 10:36, Brice Goglin a écrit :
A quick look at the code seems to confirm my feeling. get/set_module()
callbacks manipulate arrays of logical indexes, and they do not convert
them back to physical indexes before binding.

Here's a quick patch that may help. Only compile tested...

Brice



Le 11/04/2012 09:49, Brice Goglin a écrit :
Le 11/04/2012 09:06, tmishima@jcity.maeda.co.jp a écrit :
Hi, Brice.

I installed the latest hwloc-1.4.1.
Here is the output of lstopo -p.

[root@node03 bin]# ./lstopo -p
Machine (126GB)
  Socket P#0 (32GB)
    NUMANode P#0 (16GB) + L3 (5118KB)
      L2 (512KB) + L1 (64KB) + Core P#0 + PU P#0
      L2 (512KB) + L1 (64KB) + Core P#1 + PU P#4
      L2 (512KB) + L1 (64KB) + Core P#2 + PU P#8
      L2 (512KB) + L1 (64KB) + Core P#3 + PU P#12
Ok then the cpuset of this numanode is 1111.

[node03.cluster:21706] [[55518,0],0] odls:default:fork binding child
[[55518,1],0] to cpus 1111
So openmpi 1.5.4 is correct.

[node03.cluster:04706] [[40566,0],0] odls:default:fork binding child
[[40566,1],0] to cpus 000f
And openmpi 1.5.5 is indeed wrong.

Random guess: 000f is the bitmask made of hwloc *logical* indexes. hwloc
cpusets (used for binding) are internally made of hwloc *physical*
indexes (1111 here).

Jeff, Ralph:
How does OMPI 1.5.5 build hwloc cpusets for binding? Are you doing
bitmap operations on hwloc object cpusets?
If yes, I don't know what's going wrong here.
If no, are you building hwloc cpusets manually by setting individual
bits from object indexes? If yes, you must use *physical* indexes to do so.

Brice

_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users

      
_______________________________________________ users mailing list users@open-mpi.org http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users