It looks like the buffering operations consume about 15% as much time as the allreduce operations. Not huge, but not trivial, all the same. Is there any way to avoid the buffering step?
There are three steps here: buffering, transmitting, and unbuffering. Any idea how the run time is distributed among those three steps? E.g., if most time is spent in the MPI call, then combining all three steps into one is unlikely to buy you much... and might even hurt. If most of the time is spent in the MPI call, then there may be some tuning of collective algorithms to do. I don't have any experience doing this with OMPI. I'm just saying it makes some sense to isolate the problem a little bit more.Greg Fischer wrote:(I apologize in advance for the simplistic/newbie question.)
I'm performing an ALLREDUCE operation on a multi-dimensional array. This operation is the biggest bottleneck in the code, and I'm wondering if there's a way to do it more efficiently than what I'm doing now. Here's a representative example of what's happening:
ir=1
do ikl=1,km
do ij=1,jm
do ii=1,im
albuf(ir)=array(ii,ij,ikl,nl,0,ng)
ir=ir+1
enddo
enddo
enddo
agbuf=0.0
call mpi_allreduce(albuf,agbuf,im*jm*kmloc(coords(2)+1),mpi_real,mpi_sum,ang_com,ierr)
ir=1
do ikl=1,km
do ij=1,jm
do ii=1,im
phim(ii,ij,ikl,nl,0,ng)=agbuf(ir)
ir=ir+1
enddo
enddo
enddo
Is there any way to just do this in one fell swoop, rather than buffering, transmitting, and unbuffering? This operation is looped over many times. Are there savings to be had here?
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users