Open MPI logo

Open MPI User's Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |  

This web mail archive is frozen.

This page is part of a frozen web archive of this mailing list.

You can still navigate around this archive, but know that no new mails have been added to it since July of 2016.

Click here to be taken to the new web archives of this list; it includes all the mails that are in this frozen archive plus all new mails that have been sent to the list since it was migrated to the new archives.

Subject: Re: [OMPI users] Question about scheduler support
From: Ralph Castain (rhc_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-05-14 18:25:51

On May 14, 2014, at 3:21 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquyres_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> On May 14, 2014, at 6:09 PM, Ralph Castain <rhc_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> FWIW: I believe we no longer build the slurm support by default, though I'd have to check to be sure. The intent is definitely not to do so.
> The srun-based support builds by default. I like it that way. :-)

Yeah, because you actually use Slurm - but that isn't much comfort to all those who don't, but still get a slurm module.

> PMI-based support is a different animal, right?

Yes, it is.

>> The plan we adjusted to a while back was to *only* build support for schedulers upon request. Can't swear that they are all correctly updated, but that was the intent.
> Why would we do that? I'm all for a minimal ./configure line... did I miss something?

As per my other note, we are getting a continually increasing number of "default" builds due to included files in the distro when there is zero intent to actually install/use the scheduler.

> --
> Jeff Squyres
> jsquyres_at_[hidden]
> For corporate legal information go to:
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users_at_[hidden]