Open MPI logo

Open MPI User's Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |   all Open MPI User's mailing list

Subject: Re: [OMPI users] Extent of Distributed Array Type?
From: Richard Shaw (jrs65_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-04-10 12:04:17


Thanks Ralph! In future, I'll try and remember to follow up on these things
:)

Cheers,
Richard

On 10 April 2014 11:16, Ralph Castain <rhc_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Not really - it's the responsibility of the developer to file the CMR.
> Some folks are good about it, and some aren't. In this case, however, I
> suspect it didn't happen because we didn't hear back that the patch fixed
> the problem and was therefore correct :-/
>
>
> On Apr 10, 2014, at 8:02 AM, Richard Shaw <jrs65_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Okay. Thanks for having a look Ralph!
>
> For future reference, is there a better process I can go through if I find
> bugs like this that makes sure they don't get forgotten?
>
> Thanks,
> Richard
>
>
> On 10 April 2014 00:39, Ralph Castain <rhc_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> Wow - that's an ancient one. I'll see if it can be applied to 1.8.1.
>> These things don't automatically go across - it requires that someone file
>> a request to move it - and I think this commit came into the trunk after we
>> branched for the 1.7 series.
>>
>>
>> On Apr 9, 2014, at 12:05 PM, Richard Shaw <jrs65_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>> I'm not sure I ever replied to this to say that the patch works perfectly
>> (very belatedly)!
>>
>> However I just wanted to ask what the progress of getting this into a
>> released version is? I'm not particularly sure on the details on the
>> OpenMPI development process - I've noticed that it's still in the SVN
>> trunk, but hasn't made it into any of the intervening releases (neither
>> stables 1.6.2-, 1.8; nor feature releases 1.7 onwards). Will this end up in
>> the 1.9 series?
>>
>> Richard
>>
>>
>> On 24 July 2012 19:02, Richard Shaw <jrs65_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks George, I'm glad it wasn't just me being crazy. I'll try and
>>> test that one soon.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Richard
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, 24 July, 2012 at 6:28 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
>>>
>>> Richard,
>>>
>>> Thanks for identifying this issue and for the short example. I can
>>> confirm your original understanding was right, the upper bound should be
>>> identical on all ranks. I just pushed a patch (r26862), let me know if this
>>> fixes your issue.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> george.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> users_at_[hidden]
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> users_at_[hidden]
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>