Open MPI logo

Open MPI User's Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |  

This web mail archive is frozen.

This page is part of a frozen web archive of this mailing list.

You can still navigate around this archive, but know that no new mails have been added to it since July of 2016.

Click here to be taken to the new web archives of this list; it includes all the mails that are in this frozen archive plus all new mails that have been sent to the list since it was migrated to the new archives.

Subject: Re: [OMPI users] Extent of Distributed Array Type?
From: Richard Shaw (jrs65_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-04-10 11:02:00


Okay. Thanks for having a look Ralph!

For future reference, is there a better process I can go through if I find
bugs like this that makes sure they don't get forgotten?

Thanks,
Richard

On 10 April 2014 00:39, Ralph Castain <rhc_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Wow - that's an ancient one. I'll see if it can be applied to 1.8.1. These
> things don't automatically go across - it requires that someone file a
> request to move it - and I think this commit came into the trunk after we
> branched for the 1.7 series.
>
>
> On Apr 9, 2014, at 12:05 PM, Richard Shaw <jrs65_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure I ever replied to this to say that the patch works perfectly
> (very belatedly)!
>
> However I just wanted to ask what the progress of getting this into a
> released version is? I'm not particularly sure on the details on the
> OpenMPI development process - I've noticed that it's still in the SVN
> trunk, but hasn't made it into any of the intervening releases (neither
> stables 1.6.2-, 1.8; nor feature releases 1.7 onwards). Will this end up in
> the 1.9 series?
>
> Richard
>
>
> On 24 July 2012 19:02, Richard Shaw <jrs65_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> Thanks George, I'm glad it wasn't just me being crazy. I'll try and test
>> that one soon.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Richard
>>
>> On Tuesday, 24 July, 2012 at 6:28 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
>>
>> Richard,
>>
>> Thanks for identifying this issue and for the short example. I can
>> confirm your original understanding was right, the upper bound should be
>> identical on all ranks. I just pushed a patch (r26862), let me know if this
>> fixes your issue.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> george.
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>