Open MPI logo

Open MPI User's Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |  

This web mail archive is frozen.

This page is part of a frozen web archive of this mailing list.

You can still navigate around this archive, but know that no new mails have been added to it since July of 2016.

Click here to be taken to the new web archives of this list; it includes all the mails that are in this frozen archive plus all new mails that have been sent to the list since it was migrated to the new archives.

From: Jai Dayal (dayalsoap_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-23 14:10:32


The version of Open MPI I'm using is
mpiexec (OpenRTE) 1.6.5

It's what's offered on this smaller batch scheduling cluster at Oak Ridge
(Sith to be exact).

Running the ompi_info command, I get

          Thread support: posix (MPI_THREAD_MULTIPLE: no, progress: no)
   FT Checkpoint support: no (checkpoint thread: no)

and in my MPI_Init_thread call, the provided flag is returned as

I was mainly concerned because we have a threaded middleware underneath to
communicate across MPI worlds that also uses the IB infrastructure and
verbs library, so I just wanted to get some clarity as to what exactly

Brian's answer seems to make perfect sense.


On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Jeff Hammond <jeff.science_at_[hidden]>wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Barrett, Brian W <bwbarre_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
> > On 10/22/13 10:23 AM, "Jai Dayal" <dayalsoap_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> <snip>
> > I'm asking because I'm using an open_mpi build ontop of infiniband, and
> the
> > maximum thread mode is MPI_THREAD_SINGLE.
> >
> >
> > That doesn't seem right; which version of Open MPI are you using?
> The last time I looked at this, OpenMPI only supported
> MPI_THREAD_SINGLE by default and if you ask for any higher thread
> level, you get MPI_THREAD_MULTIPLE, which requires a configure-time
> switch.
> Maybe something has changed dramatically more recently than I tested.
> Squyres told me some thread-oriented refactoring was going on. All of
> this was over a year ago so it is entirely reasonable for me to be
> wrong about all of this.
> Jeff
> --
> Jeff Hammond
> jeff.science_at_[hidden]
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users_at_[hidden]