On Dec 19, 2012, at 9:22 AM, Siegmar Gross wrote:
>> I think the real shortcoming is that there is no Datatype.Resized
>> function. That can be fixed.
> Are you sure? That would at least solve one problem.
Here's a first cut at a patch.
I don't know if this is fully correct; I don't quite understand yet how baseSize is used in the .java files, but it seems incorrect to me.
For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/