Am 31.01.2012 um 20:12 schrieb Jeff Squyres:
> I only noticed after the fact that Tom is also here at Cisco (it's a big company, after all :-) ).
> I've contacted him using our proprietary super-secret Cisco handshake (i.e., the internal phone network); I'll see if I can figure out the issues off-list.
But I would be interested in a statement about a hostlist for singleton startups. Or whether it's honoring the tight integration nodes more by accident than by design. And as said: I see a wrong allocation, as the initial ./Mpitest doesn't count as process. I get a 3+1 allocation instead of 2+2 (what is granted by SGE). If started with "mpiexec -np 1 ./Mpitest" all is fine.
> On Jan 31, 2012, at 1:08 PM, Dave Love wrote:
>> Reuti <reuti_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>> Maybe it's a side effect of a tight integration that it would start on
>>> the correct nodes (but I face an incorrect allocation of slots and an
>>> error message at the end if started without mpiexec), as in this case
>>> it has no command line option for the hostfile. How to get the
>>> requested nodes if started from the command line?
>> Yes, I wouldn't expect it to work without mpirun/mpiexec and, of course,
>> I basically agree with Reuti about the rest.
>> If there is an actual SGE problem or need for an enhancement, though,
>> please file it per https://arc.liv.ac.uk/trac/SGE#mail
>> users mailing list
> Jeff Squyres
> For corporate legal information go to:
> users mailing list