Open MPI logo

Open MPI User's Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |   all Open MPI User's mailing list

Subject: Re: [OMPI users] EXTERNAL: Re: How to set up state-less node /tmp for OpenMPI usage
From: Blosch, Edwin L (edwin.l.blosch_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-03 16:55:19


I might be missing something here. Is there a side-effect or performance loss if you don't use the sm btl? Why would it exist if there is a wholly equivalent alternative? What happens to traffic that is intended for another process on the same node?

Thanks

-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:users-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Eugene Loh
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 1:23 PM
To: users_at_[hidden]
Subject: Re: [OMPI users] EXTERNAL: Re: How to set up state-less node /tmp for OpenMPI usage

Right. Actually "--mca btl ^sm". (Was missing "btl".)

On 11/3/2011 11:19 AM, Blosch, Edwin L wrote:
> I don't tell OpenMPI what BTLs to use. The default uses sm and puts a session file on /tmp, which is NFS-mounted and thus not a good choice.
>
> Are you suggesting something like --mca ^sm?
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: users-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:users-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Eugene Loh
> Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 12:54 PM
> To: users_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [OMPI users] EXTERNAL: Re: How to set up state-less node /tmp for OpenMPI usage
>
> I've not been following closely. Why must one use shared-memory
> communications? How about using other BTLs in a "loopback" fashion?
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users_at_[hidden]
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users