This web mail archive is frozen.
This page is part of a frozen web archive of this mailing list.
You can still navigate around this archive, but know that no new mails
have been added to it since July of 2016.
Click here to be taken to the new web archives of this list; it includes all the mails that are in this frozen archive plus all new mails that have been sent to the list since it was migrated to the new archives.
I don't think too many people have done combined QLogic + Mellanox runs, so this probably isn't a well-explored space.
Can you run some microbenchmarks to see what kind of latency / bandwidth you're getting between nodes of the same type and nodes of different types?
On Jul 14, 2011, at 8:21 PM, David Warren wrote:
> On my test runs (wrf run just long enough to go beyond the spinup influence)
> On just 6 of the the old mlx4 machines I get about 00:05:30 runtime
> On 3 mlx4 and 3 qib nodes I get avg of 00:06:20
> So the slow down is about 11+%
> When this is a full run 11% becomes a evry long time. This has held for some longer tests as well before I went to ofed 1.6.
> On 07/14/11 05:55, Jeff Squyres wrote:
>> On Jul 13, 2011, at 7:46 PM, David Warren wrote:
>>> I finally got access to the systems again (the original ones are part of our real time system). I thought I would try one other test I had set up first. I went to OFED 1.6 and it started running with no errors. It must have been an OFED bug. Now I just have the speed problem. Anyone have a way to make the mixture of mlx4 and qlogic work together without slowing down?
>> What do you mean by "slowing down"?
For corporate legal information go to: