On May 12, 2011, at 10:13 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On May 11, 2011, at 3:21 PM, Dave Love wrote:
>> We can reproduce it with IMB. We could provide access, but we'd have to
>> negotiate with the owners of the relevant nodes to give you interactive
>> access to them. Maybe Brock's would be more accessible? (If you
>> contact me, I may not be able to respond for a few days.)
> Brock has replied off-list that he, too, is able to reliably reproduce the issue with IMB, and is working to get access for us. Many thanks for your offer; let's see where Brock's access takes us.
I should also note that as far as I know I have three codes (CRASH, Namd (some cases), and another user code. That lockup on a collective on OpenIB but run with the same library on Gig-e.
So I am not sure it is limited to IMB, or I could be crossing errors, normally I would assume unmatched eager recvs for this sort of problem.
>>> -- we have not closed this issue,
>> Which issue? I couldn't find a relevant-looking one.
> Jeff Squyres
> For corporate legal information go to:
> users mailing list