On May 12, 2011, at 10:13 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On May 11, 2011, at 3:21 PM, Dave Love wrote:
>
>> We can reproduce it with IMB. We could provide access, but we'd have to
>> negotiate with the owners of the relevant nodes to give you interactive
>> access to them. Maybe Brock's would be more accessible? (If you
>> contact me, I may not be able to respond for a few days.)
>
> Brock has replied off-list that he, too, is able to reliably reproduce the issue with IMB, and is working to get access for us. Many thanks for your offer; let's see where Brock's access takes us.
I should also note that as far as I know I have three codes (CRASH, Namd (some cases), and another user code. That lockup on a collective on OpenIB but run with the same library on Gig-e.
So I am not sure it is limited to IMB, or I could be crossing errors, normally I would assume unmatched eager recvs for this sort of problem.
>
>>> -- we have not closed this issue,
>>
>> Which issue? I couldn't find a relevant-looking one.
>
> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/2714
>
> --
> Jeff Squyres
> jsquyres_at_[hidden]
> For corporate legal information go to:
> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>
>
|
![[Flag]](../../../../../community/mirrors/flag-us.gif){kind=small}