On Mar 8, 2011, at 12:34 PM, Eugene Loh wrote:
> Let's say you have multi-threaded MPI processes, you request MPI_THREAD_MULTIPLE and get MPI_THREAD_MULTIPLE, and you use the self,sm,tcp BTLs (which have some degree of threading support). Is it okay to have an [MPI_Isend|MPI_Irecv] on one thread be completed by an MPI_Wait on another thread? I'm assuming some sort of synchronization and memory barrier/flush in between to protect against funny race conditions.
> If it makes things any easier on you, we can do this multiple-choice style:
> 1) Forbidden by the MPI standard.
> 2) Not forbidden by the MPI standard, but will not work with OMPI (not even with the BTLs that claim to be multi-threaded).
> 3) Works well with OMPI (provided you use a BTL that's multi-threaded).
I believe the current answer is #2, but it would be great if the answer could change to be a variant of #3:
3) Works well with OMPI (provided you use a BTL that's safe to use with MPI_THREAD_MULTIPLE)
(i.e., the BTL doesn't have to be multi-threaded, itself)
For corporate legal information go to: