Hi Jeff,
Thanks for taking care of this.
Here is what I got on a worker node:
> mpirun --mca mpi_paffinity_alone 1 /opt/software/SGI/hwloc/
1.1rc6r3028/bin/hwloc-bind --get
0x00000001
Is this what is expected, please ? Or should I try yet another
command ?
Thanks, Regards, Gilbert.
Le 7 janv. 11 à 15:35, Jeff Squyres a écrit :
> On Jan 6, 2011, at 11:23 PM, Gilbert Grosdidier wrote:
>
>>> lstopo
>> Machine (35GB)
>> NUMANode L#0 (P#0 18GB) + Socket L#0 + L3 L#0 (8192KB)
>> L2 L#0 (256KB) + L1 L#0 (32KB) + Core L#0
>> PU L#0 (P#0)
>> PU L#1 (P#8)
>> L2 L#1 (256KB) + L1 L#1 (32KB) + Core L#1
>> PU L#2 (P#1)
>> PU L#3 (P#9)
>> L2 L#2 (256KB) + L1 L#2 (32KB) + Core L#2
>> PU L#4 (P#2)
>> PU L#5 (P#10)
>> L2 L#3 (256KB) + L1 L#3 (32KB) + Core L#3
>> PU L#6 (P#3)
>> PU L#7 (P#11)
> [snip]
>
> Well, this might disprove my theory. :-\ The OS indexing is not
> contiguous on the hyperthreads, so I might be wrong about what
> happened here. Try this:
>
> mpirun --mca mpi_paffinity_alone 1 hwloc-bind --get
>
> You can even run that on just one node; let's see what you get.
> This will tell us what each process is *actually* bound to. hwloc-
> bind --get will report a bitmask of the P#'s from above. So if we
> see 001, 010, 011, ...etc, then my theory of OMPI binding 1 proc per
> hyperthread (vs. 1 proc per core) is incorrect.
>
> --
> Jeff Squyres
> jsquyres_at_[hidden]
> For corporate legal information go to:
> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
>
--
*---------------------------------------------------------------------*
Gilbert Grosdidier Gilbert.Grosdidier_at_[hidden]
LAL / IN2P3 / CNRS Phone : +33 1 6446 8909
Faculté des Sciences, Bat. 200 Fax : +33 1 6446 8546
B.P. 34, F-91898 Orsay Cedex (FRANCE)
*---------------------------------------------------------------------*
|
![[Flag]](../../../../../community/mirrors/flag-us.gif){kind=small}