Open MPI logo

Open MPI User's Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |  

This web mail archive is frozen.

This page is part of a frozen web archive of this mailing list.

You can still navigate around this archive, but know that no new mails have been added to it since July of 2016.

Click here to be taken to the new web archives of this list; it includes all the mails that are in this frozen archive plus all new mails that have been sent to the list since it was migrated to the new archives.

Subject: Re: [OMPI users] difference between single and double precision
From: Mathieu Gontier (mathieu.gontier_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-12-20 08:31:09


I am now ok with the env. var. Pretty simple to set and get into the
code to pack the messages.
About tests, it is so dependent on the cluster, OpenMPI itself and the
model, this way is not an industrial way of tuning the computation. But
the env. var. is a good workaround.

Thanks again to all of you for the help.
Best regards,

On 12/16/2010 06:21 PM, Eugene Loh wrote:
> Jeff Squyres wrote:
>> On Dec 16, 2010, at 5:14 AM, Mathieu Gontier wrote:
>>> We have lead some tests and the option btl_sm_eager_limit has a positive consequence on the performance. Eugene, thank you for your links.
>> Good!
>> Just be aware of the tradeoff you're making: space for time.
>>> Now, to offer a good support to our users, we would like to get the value of this parameters at the runtime. I am aware I can have the value running ompi_info like following:
>>> ompi_info --param btl all | grep btl_sm_eager_limit
>>> but can I get the value during the computation when I run mpirun -np 12 --mca btl_sm_eager_limit 8192 my_binary? This value could be compared with the buffer size into my code and some warning put into the output.
>> We don't currently have a user-exposed method of retrieving MCA parameter values. As you noted in your 2nd email, if the value was set by setting an environment variable, then you can just getenv() it. But if the value was set some other way (e.g., via a file), it won't necessarily be loaded in the environment.
> If you are desperate to get this value, I suppose you could run
> empirical tests within your application. This would be a little ugly,
> but could work well enough if you are desperate enough.
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users_at_[hidden]