On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 12:37:54PM -0600, Ralph Castain wrote:
> No....afraid not. Things work pretty well, but there are places
> where things just don't mesh. Sub-node allocation in particular is
> an issue as it implies binding, and slurm and ompi have conflicting
> It all can get worked out, but we have limited time and nobody cares
> enough to put in the effort. Slurm just isn't used enough to make it
> worthwhile (too small an audience).
I am about to get my first HPC cluster (128 nodes), and was
considering slurm. We do use MPI.
Should I be looking at Torque instead for a queue manager?
Douglas Guptill voice: 902-461-9749
Research Assistant, LSC 4640 email: douglas.guptill_at_[hidden]
Oceanography Department fax: 902-494-3877
Halifax, NS, B3H 4J1, Canada