On Jun 4, 2010, at 10:43 AM, Barrett, Brian W wrote:
> Is indicating we don't support it really the right thing to do? Given that SM should already have the proc data, it seems that setting the reachable bit to zero for the other process of different "architecture" is all that is required.
Yes, that's more specifically what I meant (I actually cited that on the ticket I just filed -- https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/2433).
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquyres_at_[hidden]
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
|
![[Flag]](../../../../../community/mirrors/flag-us.gif){kind=small}