This web mail archive is frozen.
This page is part of a frozen web archive of this mailing list.
You can still navigate around this archive, but know that no new mails
have been added to it since July of 2016.
Click here to be taken to the new web archives of this list; it includes all the mails that are in this frozen archive plus all new mails that have been sent to the list since it was migrated to the new archives.
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 08:42 -0700, Barrett, Brian W wrote:
> Adding the memory and cc will certainly do no harm, and someone tried to remove them as an optimization. I wouldn't change the input and output lines - the differences are mainly syntactic sugar.
Gcc actually didn't like the example i sent earlier.
Another iteration gave this as a working (gcc/intel/pgi/pathscale works)
static inline int opal_atomic_cmpset_32( volatile int32_t *addr,
int32_t oldval, int32_t newval)
unsigned char ret;
__asm__ __volatile__ (
SMPLOCK "cmpxchgl %3,%2 \n\t"
"sete %0 \n\t"
: "=qm" (ret), "+a" (oldval), "+m" (*addr)
: "memory", "cc");
Ake Sandgren, HPC2N, Umea University, S-90187 Umea, Sweden
Internet: ake_at_[hidden] Phone: +46 90 7866134 Fax: +46 90 7866126
Mobile: +46 70 7716134 WWW: http://www.hpc2n.umu.se