Open MPI logo

Open MPI User's Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |  

This web mail archive is frozen.

This page is part of a frozen web archive of this mailing list.

You can still navigate around this archive, but know that no new mails have been added to it since July of 2016.

Click here to be taken to the new web archives of this list; it includes all the mails that are in this frozen archive plus all new mails that have been sent to the list since it was migrated to the new archives.

Subject: Re: [OMPI users] Progress in MPI_Win_unlock
From: Dave Goodell (goodell_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-04 12:07:53

On Feb 3, 2010, at 6:24 PM, Dorian Krause wrote:

> Unless it is also specified that a process must eventually exit with
> a call to MPI_Finalize (I couldn't find such a requirement),
> progress for RMA access to a passive server which does not
> participate actively in any MPI communication is not guaranteed,
> right?
> (Btw. mvapich2 has the same behavior in this regard)

For the finalize requirement, see MPI-2.2 page 291, lines 36-38:

This routine cleans up all MPI state. Each process must call
MPI_FINALIZE before it exits. Unless there has been a call to
MPI_ABORT, each process must ensure that all pending nonblocking
communications are (locally) complete before calling MPI_FINALIZE.

MPI is intentionally vague on progress issues and leaves lots of room
for implementation choices.

I'll let the Open MPI folks answer the questions about their