Hi,
I am confused about the syntax of the "in place" variant of
MPI_Reduce, in particular about the significance of the recvbuf
for the non-root processes. I.e., is the following legal?
buf = (double *)malloc(l*sizeof(double);
random(buf, l); /* fill buf with something */
if (myid == 0) {
MPI_Reduce(MPI_IN_PLACE, buf, l, MPI_DOUBLE, MPI_SUM, 0, MPI_COMM_WORLD);
} else {
MPI_Reduce(buf, NULL, l, MPI_DOUBLE, MPI_SUM, 0, MPI_COMM_WORLD);
}
This appears to violate the standard:
http://www.mpi-forum.org/docs/mpi22-report/node103.htm#Node103
"The routine is called by all group members using the same arguments for
count, datatype, op, root and comm. Thus, all processes provide input
buffers and output buffers of the same length, with elements of the
same type."
However, this "same length" requirement is already violated at the root
process where I can specify MPI_IN_PLACE. Unfortunately, the standard
says nothing about the other processes in this case. Do I need a valid
receive buffer there?
Cheers,
Martin
--
Martin Siegert
Head, Research Computing
WestGrid Site Lead
IT Services phone: 778 782-4691
Simon Fraser University fax: 778 782-4242
Burnaby, British Columbia email: siegert_at_[hidden]
Canada V5A 1S6
|
![[Flag]](../../../../../community/mirrors/flag-us.gif){kind=small}