Open MPI logo

Open MPI User's Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |  

This web mail archive is frozen.

This page is part of a frozen web archive of this mailing list.

You can still navigate around this archive, but know that no new mails have been added to it since July of 2016.

Click here to be taken to the new web archives of this list; it includes all the mails that are in this frozen archive plus all new mails that have been sent to the list since it was migrated to the new archives.

Subject: Re: [OMPI users] very bad parallel scaling of vasp using openmpi
From: Peter Kjellstrom (cap_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-09-23 12:56:11


On Wednesday 23 September 2009, Rahul Nabar wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Gerry Creager <gerry.creager_at_[hidden]>
wrote:
> > Most of that bandwidth is in marketing...  Sorry, but it's not a high
> > performance switch.
>
> Well, how does one figure out what exactly is a "hih performance
> switch"?

IMHO 1G Ethernet won't be enough ("high performance" or not). Get yourself
some cheap IB HCAs and a switch. The only chance you have with Ethernet is to
run some sort of bypass proto (OpenMX etc.) and tune your NICs.

/Peter

> I've found this an exceedingly hard task. Like the OP posted
> the Dell 6248 is rated to give more than a fully subscribed backbone
> capacity. Nor I do not know any good third party test lab nor do I
> know any switch load testing benchmarks that'd take a switch through
> its paces.
>
> So, how does one go about selecting a good switch? "The most expensive
> the better" is somewhat a unsatisfying option!