Open MPI logo

Open MPI User's Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |  

This web mail archive is frozen.

This page is part of a frozen web archive of this mailing list.

You can still navigate around this archive, but know that no new mails have been added to it since July of 2016.

Click here to be taken to the new web archives of this list; it includes all the mails that are in this frozen archive plus all new mails that have been sent to the list since it was migrated to the new archives.

Subject: Re: [OMPI users] Performance difference on OpenMPI, IntelMPI and ScaliMPI
From: Terry Dontje (Terry.Dontje_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-05 10:06:35


A comment to the below. I meant the 2x performance was for shared
memory communications.

--td
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2009 09:55:42 -0400
> From: Terry Dontje <Terry.Dontje_at_[hidden]>
> Subject: Re: [OMPI users] Performance difference on OpenMPI, IntelMPI
> and ScaliMPI
> To: users_at_[hidden]
> Message-ID: <4A798F5E.3000002_at_[hidden]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII; format=flowed
>
> We've found on certain applications binding to processors can have up to
> a 2x difference. ScaliMPI automatically binds processes by socket so if
> you are not running a one process per cpu job each process will land on
> a different socket.
>
> OMPI defaults to not binding at all. You may want to try and use the
> rankfile option (see manpage) and see if that helps any.
>
> If the above doesn't improve anything the next question is do you know
> what the sizes of the messages are? For very small messages I believe
> Scali shows a 2x better performance than Intel and OMPI (I think this is
> due to a fastpath optimization).