This web mail archive is frozen.
This page is part of a frozen web archive of this mailing list.
You can still navigate around this archive, but know that no new mails
have been added to it since July of 2016.
Click here to be taken to the new web archives of this list; it includes all the mails that are in this frozen archive plus all new mails that have been sent to the list since it was migrated to the new archives.
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 03:24:07PM -0400, Luis Vitorio Cargnini wrote:
> Thanks, but I really do not want to use Boost.
> Is easier ? certainly is, but I want to make it using only MPI
> and not been dependent of a Library, or templates like the majority
> boost a huge set of templates and wrappers for different libraries,
> implemented in C, supplying a wrapper for C++.
> I admit Boost is a valuable tool, but in my case, as much
> independent I
> could be from additional libs, better.
If you do not want to use boost, then I suggest not using nested
vectors but just ones that contain PODs as value_type (or even
If you insist on using complicated containers you will end up
writing your own MPI-C++ abstraction (resulting in a library). This
will be a lot of (unnecessary and hard) work.
Just my 2 cents.