This web mail archive is frozen.
This page is part of a frozen web archive of this mailing list.
You can still navigate around this archive, but know that no new mails
have been added to it since July of 2016.
Click here to be taken to the new web archives of this list; it includes all the mails that are in this frozen archive plus all new mails that have been sent to the list since it was migrated to the new archives.
On Jul 3, 2009, at 7:42 PM, Dorian Krause wrote:
> I would discourage you to use the C++ bindings, since (to my
> they might be removed from MPI 3.0 (there is such a proposal).
There is a proposal that has passed one vote so far to deprecate the C+
+ bindings in MPI-2.2 (meaning: still have them, but advise against
using them). This opens the door for potentially removing the C++
bindings in MPI-3.0.
As has been mentioned on this thread already, the official MPI C++
bindings are fairly simplistic -- they take advantage of a few
language features, but not a lot. They are effectively a 1-to-1
mapping to the C bindings. The Boost.MPI library added quite a few
nice C++-friendly abstractions on top of MPI. But if Boost is
unattractive for you, then your best bet is probably just to use the C