Open MPI User's Mailing List Archives

Subject: Re: [OMPI users] OpenMPI vs Intel MPI
From: Eugene Loh (Eugene.Loh_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-07-02 10:38:10

• Next message: Ashley Pittman: "Re: [OMPI users] quadrics support?"
• Previous message: Eugene Loh: "Re: [OMPI users] OpenMPI vs Intel MPI"
• In reply to: Lenny Verkhovsky: "Re: [OMPI users] OpenMPI vs Intel MPI"
• Next in thread: Eugene Loh: "Re: [OMPI users] OpenMPI vs Intel MPI"

2.   if you are using Open MPI 1.3 you dont have to use mpi_leave_pinned 1 , since it's a default value

On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Swamy Kandadai <swamy@us.ibm.com> wrote:

Here are muy options with OpenMPI:

mpirun -n 8 --machinefile hf --mca rmaps_rank_file_path rankfile --mca coll_sm_info_num_procs 8 --mca btl self,sm -mca mpi_leave_pinned 1 ./xhpl_ompi

Here is my rankfile:

at rankfile
rank 0=i02n05 slot=0
rank 1=i02n05 slot=1
rank 2=i02n05 slot=2
rank 3=i02n05 slot=3
rank 4=i02n05 slot=4
rank 5=i02n05 slot=5
rank 6=i02n05 slot=6
rank 7=i02n05 slot=7

• Next message: Ashley Pittman: "Re: [OMPI users] quadrics support?"
• Previous message: Eugene Loh: "Re: [OMPI users] OpenMPI vs Intel MPI"
• In reply to: Lenny Verkhovsky: "Re: [OMPI users] OpenMPI vs Intel MPI"
• Next in thread: Eugene Loh: "Re: [OMPI users] OpenMPI vs Intel MPI"