Open MPI logo

Open MPI User's Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |   all Open MPI User's mailing list

Subject: Re: [OMPI users] users Digest, Vol 1302, Issue 1
From: Ricardo Fonseca (ricardo.fonseca_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-07-29 11:27:50


Yes, I am using the right one. I've installed the freshly compiled
openmpi into /opt/openmpi/1.3.3-g95-32. If I edit the mpif.h file by
hand and put "error!" in the first line I get:

zamblap:sandbox zamb$ edit /opt/openmpi/1.3.3-g95-32/include/mpif.h

zamblap:sandbox zamb$ mpif77 inplace_test.f90

In file mpif.h:1

     Included at inplace_test.f90:7

error!

1

Error: Unclassifiable statement at (1)

(btw, if I use the F90 bindings instead I get a similar problem,
except the address for the MPI_IN_PLACE fortran constant is slightly
different from the F77 binding, i.e. instead of 0x50920 I get 0x508e0)

Thanks for your help,

Ricardo

> Subject: Re: [OMPI users] OMPI users] MPI_IN_PLACE in Fortran
> withMPI_REDUCE / MPI_ALLREDUCE
> From: Jeff Squyres (jsquyres_at_[hidden])
> Date: 2009-07-29 08:54:38
>
> Can you confirm that you're using the right mpif.h?
>
> Keep in mind that each MPI implementation's mpif.h is different --
> it's a common mistake to assume that the mpif.h from one MPI
> implementation should work with another implementation (e.g., someone
> copied mpif.h from one MPI to your software's source tree, so the
> compiler always finds that one instead of the MPI-implementation-
> provided mpif.h.).
>
>
> On Jul 28, 2009, at 1:17 PM, Ricardo Fonseca wrote: