Open MPI logo

Open MPI User's Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |  

This web mail archive is frozen.

This page is part of a frozen web archive of this mailing list.

You can still navigate around this archive, but know that no new mails have been added to it since July of 2016.

Click here to be taken to the new web archives of this list; it includes all the mails that are in this frozen archive plus all new mails that have been sent to the list since it was migrated to the new archives.

Subject: Re: [OMPI users] ifort and gfortran module
From: Jeff Squyres (jsquyres_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-07-23 07:47:35

FWIW, for the Fortran MPI programmers out there, the MPI Forum is hard
at work on a new Fortran 03 set of bindings for MPI-3. We have a
prototype in a side branch of Open MPI that is "mostly" working. We
(the MPI Forum) expect to release a short document describing the new
features and the prototype Open MPI implementation for larger Fortran
community comment within a few months.

On Jul 23, 2009, at 7:03 AM, Dave Love wrote:

> Jeff Squyres <jsquyres_at_[hidden]> writes:
> > See
> Ah, neat. I'd never thought of that, possibly due to ELF not being
> relevant when I first started worrying about that sort of thing.
> > Indeed. In OMPI, we tried to make this as simple as possible. But
> > unless you use specific compiler options to hide their
> differences, it
> > isn't possible and is beyond our purview to fix. :-(
> Sure. It was a question of whether it's just the interface, in which
> case flags may help with Fortran.
> > (similar situation with the C++ bindings)
> I'd have expected it to be worse, since compilers intentionally have
> inconsistent name-mangling as I understand it, but I'm not clever
> enough
> to understand C++ anyway :-/.
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users_at_[hidden]

Jeff Squyres